[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c2a15271887aa3f5d759771ddedac04e11db743.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 12:52:55 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>,
richardcochran@...il.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com,
yangbo.lu@....com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: mlichvar@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] ptp: Request cycles for TX timestamp
On Sun, 2022-05-01 at 13:18 +0200, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
> The free running cycle counter of physical clocks called cycles shall be
> used for hardware timestamps to enable synchronisation.
>
> Introduce new flag SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_USE_CYCLES, which signals driver to
> provide a TX timestamp based on cycles if cycles are supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
> ---
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 5 +++++
> net/core/skbuff.c | 5 +++++
> net/socket.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 3270cb72e4d8..fa03e02b761d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -615,6 +615,11 @@ enum {
> /* device driver is going to provide hardware time stamp */
> SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS = 1 << 2,
>
> + /* generate hardware time stamp based on cycles if supported, flag is
> + * used only for TX path
> + */
> + SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_USE_CYCLES = 1 << 3,
> +
> /* generate wifi status information (where possible) */
> SKBTX_WIFI_STATUS = 1 << 4,
Don't you need to update accordingly SKBTX_ANY_TSTAMP, so that this
flags is preserved on segmentation?
Thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists