[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 09:11:02 +0200
From: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
Dmitrii Bezrukov <dbezrukov@...vell.com>
CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aashay Shringarpure <aashay@...gle.com>,
"Yi Chou" <yich@...gle.com>,
Shervin Oloumi <enlightened@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 0/5] net: atlantic: more fuzzing fixes
Hi Grant and Dmitrii,
>> So to close session I guess need to set is_rsc_completed to true when
>> number of frags is going to exceed value MAX_SKB_FRAGS, then packet will
>> be built and submitted to stack.
>> But of course need to check that there will not be any other corner cases
>> with this new change.
>
> Ok. Sounds like I should post a v2 then and just drop 1/5 and 5/5
> patches. Will post that tomorrow.
I think the part with check `hw_head_ >= ring->size` still can be used safely (patch 5).
For patch 1 - I agree it may make things worse, so either drop or think on how to interpret invalid `next` and stop LRO session.
Thanks,
Igor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists