[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 08:21:15 +0000
From: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"hawk@...nel.org" <hawk@...nel.org>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
"kafai@...com" <kafai@...com>,
"songliubraving@...com" <songliubraving@...com>,
"yhs@...com" <yhs@...com>,
"kpsingh@...nel.org" <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"bigeasy@...utronix.de" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"imagedong@...cent.com" <imagedong@...cent.com>,
"petrm@...dia.com" <petrm@...dia.com>,
"memxor@...il.com" <memxor@...il.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"weiyongjun (A)" <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
yuehaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf/xdp: Can't detach BPF XDP prog if not exist
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [mailto:toke@...hat.com]
发送时间: 2022年5月4日 19:20
收件人: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; bpf@...r.kernel.org; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com
抄送: ast@...nel.org; daniel@...earbox.net; hawk@...nel.org; john.fastabend@...il.com; andrii@...nel.org; kafai@...com; songliubraving@...com; yhs@...com; kpsingh@...nel.org; bigeasy@...utronix.de; imagedong@...cent.com; petrm@...dia.com; memxor@...il.com; arnd@...db.de; weiyongjun (A) <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>; shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>; yuehaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
主题: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf/xdp: Can't detach BPF XDP prog if not exist
Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com> writes:
> if user sets nonexistent xdp_flags to detach xdp prog, kernel should
> return err and tell user that detach failed with detail info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
I kinda see your point, but this will change user-visible behaviour that applications might be relying on, so I don't think we can make this change at this stage. Why can't your application just query the link for whether a program is attached?
-Toke
Thank you for your reply. I wiil change sample application firstly. But if kernel does nothing and return 0, maybe user will think setup is OK, actually It failed. Is this acceptable?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists