netdev - Re: [BUG] Layerscape CAAM+kTLS+io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220505171000.48a9155b@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 May 2022 17:10:00 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
        Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
        Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@....com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Layerscape CAAM+kTLS+io_uring

On Thu, 5 May 2022 21:20:46 +0200 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> no one seems to care about this problem. :/
> 
> Maybe too many components are involved, I'm the respective maintainers
> on Cc.
> 
> Cc += the CAAM maintainers
> Cc += the io_uring maintainers
> Cc += the kTLS maintainers
> 
> On 27.04.2022 10:20:40, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have a Layerscape-1046a based board where I'm trying to use a
> > combination of liburing (v2.0) with splice, kTLS and CAAM (kernel
> > v5.17). The problem I see is that on shutdown the last bytes are
> > missing. It looks like io_uring is not waiting for all completions
> > from the CAAM driver.
> > 
> > With ARM-ASM instead of the CAAM, the setup works fine.  
> 
> What's the difference between the CAAM and ARM-ASM crypto? Without
> looking into the code I think the CAAM is asynchron while ARM-ASM is
> synchron. Is this worth investigating?

Sounds like
20ffc7adf53a ("net/tls: missing received data after fast remote close")