[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220506223739.1930-1-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 15:37:38 -0700
From: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: richardcochran@...il.com, kernel-team@...com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH net RESEND] ptp: ocp: have adjtime handle negative delta_ns correctly
delta_ns is a s64, but it was being passed ptp_ocp_adjtime_coarse
as an u64. Also, it turns out that timespec64_add_ns() only handles
positive values, so the math needs to be updated.
Fix by passing in the correct signed value, then adding to a
nanosecond version of the timespec.
Fixes: 90f8f4c0e3ce ("ptp: ocp: Add ptp_ocp_adjtime_coarse for large adjustments")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
---
Resend to fix misquoted Fixes: tag
---
drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
index dd45471f6780..65e592ec272e 100644
--- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
+++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
@@ -841,16 +841,18 @@ __ptp_ocp_adjtime_locked(struct ptp_ocp *bp, u32 adj_val)
}
static void
-ptp_ocp_adjtime_coarse(struct ptp_ocp *bp, u64 delta_ns)
+ptp_ocp_adjtime_coarse(struct ptp_ocp *bp, s64 delta_ns)
{
struct timespec64 ts;
unsigned long flags;
int err;
+ s64 ns;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bp->lock, flags);
err = __ptp_ocp_gettime_locked(bp, &ts, NULL);
if (likely(!err)) {
- timespec64_add_ns(&ts, delta_ns);
+ ns = timespec64_to_ns(&ts) + delta_ns;
+ ts = ns_to_timespec64(ns);
__ptp_ocp_settime_locked(bp, &ts);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bp->lock, flags);
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists