[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220505185742.1246d738@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 18:57:42 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
Cc: richardcochran@...il.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/2] ptp: ptp_clockmatrix: Add PTP_CLK_REQ_EXTTS
support
On Wed, 4 May 2022 16:50:54 -0400 Min Li wrote:
> Use TOD_READ_SECONDARY for extts to keep TOD_READ_PRIMARY
> for gettime and settime exclusively
Can you fill in more details about what the user visible problem is?
Judging by the fact that you haven't tagged the patch as
[PATCH net-next] after my previous explanation you do think this
is a fix. But "Add xyz support" sounds like a feature, not a fix.
> Signed-off-by: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
> Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> - err = char_array_to_timespec(buf, sizeof(buf), ts);
> -
> - return err;
> + return char_array_to_timespec(buf, sizeof(buf), ts);
I don't think you were modifying this code, so no need to clean it up
in this commit. It's unrelated to the change you're making now.
> }
> - /* Re-enable extts */
> - if (extts_mask)
> - idtcm_enable_extts_mask(channel, extts_mask, true);
> + err = _idtcm_gettime(channel, ts, 10);
>
> return err;
> }
Here, tho, you are changing the code, and yet you haven't done what
I asked.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists