[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220507095304.0688200b@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 09:53:04 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: : [PATCH] ftrace/x86: Add FTRACE_MCOUNT_MAX_OFFSET to avoid
adding weak functions
On Fri, 6 May 2022 21:38:29 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> You forgot about IBT again? __fentry__ no longer lives at +0 on x86
> anymore.
I didn't forget. It was that the kernel I wrote this for didn't have it ;-)
I wasn't sure if it was accepted into mainline yet.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists