[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220508045507.ut2t5n2yyxvpoe22@bsd-mbp>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 21:55:07 -0700
From: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
kernel-team@...com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ptp: ocp: have adjtime handle negative delta_ns
correctly
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 01:19:54AM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 06.05.2022 00:40, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > delta_ns is a s64, but it was being passed ptp_ocp_adjtime_coarse
> > as an u64. Also, it turns out that timespec64_add_ns() only handles
> > positive values, so the math needs to be updated.
> >
> > Fix by passing in the correct signed value, then adding to a
> > nanosecond version of the timespec.
> >
> > Fixes: '90f8f4c0e3ce ("ptp: ocp: Add ptp_ocp_adjtime_coarse for large adjustments")'
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
> > index dd45471f6780..65e592ec272e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
> > @@ -841,16 +841,18 @@ __ptp_ocp_adjtime_locked(struct ptp_ocp *bp, u32 adj_val)
> > }
> > static void
> > -ptp_ocp_adjtime_coarse(struct ptp_ocp *bp, u64 delta_ns)
> > +ptp_ocp_adjtime_coarse(struct ptp_ocp *bp, s64 delta_ns)
> > {
> > struct timespec64 ts;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int err;
> > + s64 ns;
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&bp->lock, flags);
> > err = __ptp_ocp_gettime_locked(bp, &ts, NULL);
> > if (likely(!err)) {
> > - timespec64_add_ns(&ts, delta_ns);
> > + ns = timespec64_to_ns(&ts) + delta_ns;
> > + ts = ns_to_timespec64(ns);
>
> Maybe use set_normalized_timespec64 instead of this ugly transformations and
> additional variable?
I don't see how that would work - set_normalized_timespec64 just sets
the ts from a <sec>.<nsec> value. In this case, delta_ns need to be
added in to the ts value, but timespec64_add_ns() doeesn't handle
negative values, hence the conversion / add / reconversion.
--
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists