[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7017c234-7c73-524a-11b6-fefdd5646f59@igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 11:16:10 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, pmladek@...e.com, bhe@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, kernel@...ccoli.net, halves@...onical.com,
fabiomirmar@...il.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@...cle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de,
corbet@....net, d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
jgross@...e.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
tglx@...utronix.de, vgoyal@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/30] panic: Introduce the panic post-reboot notifier
list
On 27/04/2022 19:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently we have 3 notifier lists in the panic path, which will
> be wired in a way to allow the notifier callbacks to run in
> different moments at panic time, in a subsequent patch.
>
> But there is also an odd set of architecture calls hardcoded in
> the end of panic path, after the restart machinery. They're
> responsible for late time tunings / events, like enabling a stop
> button (Sparc) or effectively stopping the machine (s390).
>
> This patch introduces yet another notifier list to offer the
> architectures a way to add callbacks in such late moment on
> panic path without the need of ifdefs / hardcoded approaches.
>
> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
Hey S390/SPARC folks, sorry for the ping!
Any reviews on this V1 would be greatly appreciated, I'm working on V2
and seeking feedback in the non-reviewed patches.
Thanks in advance,
Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists