netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: net: Add documentation for phy-supply

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 May 2022 17:12:33 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     LABBE Corentin <clabbe@...libre.com>, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
        calvin.johnson@....nxp.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        jernej.skrabec@...il.com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, pabeni@...hat.com,
        peppe.cavallaro@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org, samuel@...lland.org,
        wens@...e.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: net: Add documentation for phy-supply

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:02:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 03:26:47PM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:

> > For the difference between the 2, according to my basic read (I am bad a it) of the shematic
> > https://linux-sunxi.org/images/5/50/OrangePi_3_Schematics_v1.5.pdf
> > phy-io(ephy-vdd25) seems to (at least) power MDIO bus.

> So there is nothing in the data sheet of the RTL8211E to suggest you
> can uses these different power supplies independently. The naming
> 'phy-io-supply' is very specific to RTL8211E, but you are defining a
> generic binding here. I don't know the regulator binding, it is
> possible to make phy-supply a list?

No, that's not a thing - the supplies are individual, named properties
and even if there were a list we'd still want them to be named so it's
clear what's going on.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)