[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ynk9ccoVh32Deg45@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 17:12:33 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: LABBE Corentin <clabbe@...libre.com>, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
calvin.johnson@....nxp.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, kuba@...nel.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, pabeni@...hat.com,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org, samuel@...lland.org,
wens@...e.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: net: Add documentation for phy-supply
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:02:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 03:26:47PM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> > For the difference between the 2, according to my basic read (I am bad a it) of the shematic
> > https://linux-sunxi.org/images/5/50/OrangePi_3_Schematics_v1.5.pdf
> > phy-io(ephy-vdd25) seems to (at least) power MDIO bus.
> So there is nothing in the data sheet of the RTL8211E to suggest you
> can uses these different power supplies independently. The naming
> 'phy-io-supply' is very specific to RTL8211E, but you are defining a
> generic binding here. I don't know the regulator binding, it is
> possible to make phy-supply a list?
No, that's not a thing - the supplies are individual, named properties
and even if there were a list we'd still want them to be named so it's
clear what's going on.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists