netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: orion-mdio: Convert to JSON schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1eae77d7-300f-4356-c4f4-263c0d3f2bac@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 00:47:23 +0000
From:   Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: orion-mdio: Convert to JSON schema

On 10/05/22 12:28, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri,  6 May 2022 09:06:20 +1200 Chris Packham wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: orion-mdio: Convert to JSON schema
> JSON or YAML?

I based that on other commits at that do something similar and say 
"Convert to JSON schema", although I might be operating on old data.

Looking again now with `git log --oneline --no-merges --grep onvert -- 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/` I see "Convert binding to YAML" and 
"convert to dtschema" (still a few json-schema in there).

I guess technically the binding is written in YAML but forms part of 
schema which is ultimately consumed by jsonschema but perhaps the use of 
jsonschema is an implementation detail that doesn't require mentioning.

I'm happy to reword the subject and send a v3 if people feel strongly 
about it.