netdev - Re: [RFC v8 net-next 08/16] mfd: ocelot: add support for the vsc7512 chip via spi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 15:58:54 +0000
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v8 net-next 08/16] mfd: ocelot: add support for the vsc7512
 chip via spi

On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:53:05AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> +static const struct mfd_cell vsc7512_devs[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name = "ocelot-pinctrl",
> +		.of_compatible = "mscc,ocelot-pinctrl",
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(vsc7512_pinctrl_resources),
> +		.resources = vsc7512_pinctrl_resources,
> +	}, {
> +		.name = "ocelot-sgpio",
> +		.of_compatible = "mscc,ocelot-sgpio",
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(vsc7512_sgpio_resources),
> +		.resources = vsc7512_sgpio_resources,
> +	}, {
> +		.name = "ocelot-miim0",
> +		.of_compatible = "mscc,ocelot-miim",
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(vsc7512_miim0_resources),
> +		.resources = vsc7512_miim0_resources,

I wonder whether you can differentiate these 2 MFD cells by "use_of_reg"
+ "of_reg".

> +	}, {
> +		.name = "ocelot-miim1",
> +		.of_compatible = "mscc,ocelot-miim",
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(vsc7512_miim1_resources),
> +		.resources = vsc7512_miim1_resources,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +const struct of_device_id ocelot_spi_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "mscc,vsc7512_mfd_spi" },
> +	{ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ocelot_spi_of_match);

Don't forget to add a struct spi_device_id table for the driver.

> +
> +static struct spi_driver ocelot_spi_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "ocelot_mfd_spi",
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ocelot_spi_of_match),
> +	},
> +	.probe = ocelot_spi_probe,
> +};
> +module_spi_driver(ocelot_spi_driver);