[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c7dfe73-6691-1ca5-7555-27e81dff4dcd@igalia.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 16:58:43 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, pmladek@...e.com, bhe@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, kernel@...ccoli.net, halves@...onical.com,
fabiomirmar@...il.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@...cle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de,
corbet@....net, d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
jgross@...e.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
tglx@...utronix.de, vgoyal@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/30] panic: Introduce the panic post-reboot notifier
list
On 11/05/2022 13:45, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Hey S390/SPARC folks, sorry for the ping!
>>
>> Any reviews on this V1 would be greatly appreciated, I'm working on V2
>> and seeking feedback in the non-reviewed patches.
>
> Sorry, missed that this is quite s390 specific. So, yes, this looks
> good to me and nice to see that one of the remaining CONFIG_S390 in
> common code will be removed!
>
> For the s390 bits:
> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
No need for apologies, I really appreciate your review!
Will add your Ack for V2 =)
Cheers,
Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists