netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: enetc: count the tc-taprio window drops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220511231745.4olqfvxiz4qm5oht@skbuf>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 23:17:46 +0000
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
        Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: enetc: count the tc-taprio window drops

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 04:13:46PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2022 22:57:46 +0000 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > The only entry that is a counter in the Scheduled Traffic MIB is TransmissionOverrun,
> > but that isn't what this is. Instead, this would be a TransmissionOverrunAvoidedByDropping,
> > for which there appears to be no standardization.
> 
> TransmissionOversized? There's no standardization in terms of IEEE but
> the semantics seem pretty clear right? The packet is longer than the
> entire window so it can never go out?

Yes, so what are you saying? Become the ad-hoc standards body for
scheduled traffic?