Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzat1U+=sPPGXP0X-B-Ay8ruN81ppFK00dopgCGxAwmkzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 17:10:23 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/5] bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie helpers

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:21 PM Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> On 2022-05-07 00:34, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 10:15 AM Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This commit adds selftests for the new BPF helpers:
> >> bpf_tcp_raw_{gen,check}_syncookie_ipv{4,6}.
> >>
> >> xdp_synproxy_kern.c is a BPF program that generates SYN cookies on
> >> allowed TCP ports and sends SYNACKs to clients, accelerating synproxy
> >> iptables module.
> >>
> >> xdp_synproxy.c is a userspace control application that allows to
> >> configure the following options in runtime: list of allowed ports, MSS,
> >> window scale, TTL.
> >>
> >> A selftest is added to prog_tests that leverages the above programs to
> >> test the functionality of the new helpers.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > selftests should use "selftests/bpf: " subject prefix, not "bpf: ",
> > please update so it's more obvious that this patch touches selftests
> > and not kernel-side BPF functionality.
> >
> >>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore        |   1 +
> >>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |   5 +-
> >>   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c   | 109 +++
> >>   .../selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c   | 750 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_synproxy.c    | 418 ++++++++++
> >>   5 files changed, 1281 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c
> >>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c
> >>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_synproxy.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
> >> index 595565eb68c0..ca2f47f45670 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
> >> @@ -43,3 +43,4 @@ test_cpp
> >>   *.tmp
> >>   xdpxceiver
> >>   xdp_redirect_multi
> >> +xdp_synproxy
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >> index bafdc5373a13..8ae602843b16 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >> @@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := with_addr.sh \
> >>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = test_sock_addr test_skb_cgroup_id_user \
> >>          flow_dissector_load test_flow_dissector test_tcp_check_syncookie_user \
> >>          test_lirc_mode2_user xdping test_cpp runqslower bench bpf_testmod.ko \
> >> -       xdpxceiver xdp_redirect_multi
> >> +       xdpxceiver xdp_redirect_multi xdp_synproxy
> >>
> >> -TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS = $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read
> >> +TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS = $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read $(OUTPUT)/xdp_synproxy
> >>
> >>   # Emit succinct information message describing current building step
> >>   # $1 - generic step name (e.g., CC, LINK, etc);
> >> @@ -500,6 +500,7 @@ TRUNNER_EXTRA_SOURCES := test_progs.c cgroup_helpers.c trace_helpers.c      \
> >>                           cap_helpers.c
> >>   TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES := $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read $(OUTPUT)/bpf_testmod.ko \
> >>                         $(OUTPUT)/liburandom_read.so                     \
> >> +                      $(OUTPUT)/xdp_synproxy                           \
> >
> > this is the right way to make external binary available to test_progs
> > flavors, but is there anything inherently requiring external binary
> > instead of having a helper function doing the same? urandom_read has
> > to be a separate binary.
>
> If you remember v1, it used to be a sample, but I was asked to convert
> it to a selftest, because samples are deprecated. The intention of
> having this separate binary is to have a sample reference implementation
> that can be used in real-world scenarios with minor or no changes.
>

Ok, I'll let others chime in if they care enough about this. Selftests
are first and foremost a test and not an almost production-ready
collection of tools, but fine by me.

> >>                         ima_setup.sh                                     \
> >>                         $(wildcard progs/btf_dump_test_case_*.c)
> >>   TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE := CLANG_BPF_BUILD_RULE
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..e08b28e25047
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_synproxy.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +#include <test_progs.h>
> >> +#include <network_helpers.h>
> >> +
> >> +#define SYS(cmd) ({ \
> >> +       if (!ASSERT_OK(system(cmd), (cmd))) \
> >> +               goto out; \
> >> +})
> >> +
> >> +#define SYS_OUT(cmd) ({ \
> >> +       FILE *f = popen((cmd), "r"); \
> >> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(f, (cmd))) \
> >> +               goto out; \
> >> +       f; \
> >> +})
> >> +
> >> +static bool expect_str(char *buf, size_t size, const char *str)
> >> +{
> >> +       if (size != strlen(str))
> >> +               return false;
> >> +       return !memcmp(buf, str, size);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +void test_xdp_synproxy(void)
> >> +{
> >> +       int server_fd = -1, client_fd = -1, accept_fd = -1;
> >> +       struct nstoken *ns = NULL;
> >> +       FILE *ctrl_file = NULL;
> >> +       char buf[1024];
> >> +       size_t size;
> >> +
> >> +       SYS("ip netns add synproxy");
> >> +
> >> +       SYS("ip link add tmp0 type veth peer name tmp1");
> >> +       SYS("ip link set tmp1 netns synproxy");
> >> +       SYS("ip link set tmp0 up");
> >> +       SYS("ip addr replace 198.18.0.1/24 dev tmp0");
> >
> >> +
> >> +       // When checksum offload is enabled, the XDP program sees wrong
> >> +       // checksums and drops packets.
> >> +       SYS("ethtool -K tmp0 tx off");
> >> +       // Workaround required for veth.
> >
> > don't use C++ comments, please stick to /* */
> >
> >> +       SYS("ip link set tmp0 xdp object xdp_dummy.o section xdp 2> /dev/null");
> >> +
> >> +       ns = open_netns("synproxy");
> >> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ns, "setns"))
> >> +               goto out;
> >> +
> >> +       SYS("ip link set lo up");
> >> +       SYS("ip link set tmp1 up");
> >> +       SYS("ip addr replace 198.18.0.2/24 dev tmp1");
> >> +       SYS("sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies=2");
> >> +       SYS("sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=1");
> >> +       SYS("sysctl -w net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_tcp_loose=0");
> >> +       SYS("iptables -t raw -I PREROUTING \
> >> +           -i tmp1 -p tcp -m tcp --syn --dport 8080 -j CT --notrack");
> >> +       SYS("iptables -t filter -A INPUT \
> >> +           -i tmp1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -m state --state INVALID,UNTRACKED \
> >> +           -j SYNPROXY --sack-perm --timestamp --wscale 7 --mss 1460");
> >> +       SYS("iptables -t filter -A INPUT \
> >> +           -i tmp1 -m state --state INVALID -j DROP");
> >> +
> >> +       ctrl_file = SYS_OUT("./xdp_synproxy --iface tmp1 --ports 8080 --single \
> >> +                           --mss4 1460 --mss6 1440 --wscale 7 --ttl 64");
> >> +       size = fread(buf, 1, sizeof(buf), ctrl_file);
> >
> > buf is uninitialized so if fread fail strlen() can cause SIGSEGV or
> > some other failure mode
>
> No, it will exit on the assert below (size won't be equal to strlen(str)).

it's better to use ASSERT_STREQ() which will also emit expected and
actual strings if they don't match. So maybe check size first, and
then ASSERT_STREQ() instead of custom expect_str() "helper"?

>
> >
> >> +       pclose(ctrl_file);
> >> +       if (!ASSERT_TRUE(expect_str(buf, size, "Total SYNACKs generated: 0\n"),
> >> +                        "initial SYNACKs"))
> >> +               goto out;
> >> +
> >> +       server_fd = start_server(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, "198.18.0.2", 8080, 0);
> >> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(server_fd, 0, "start_server"))
> >> +               goto out;
> >> +
> >> +       close_netns(ns);
> >> +       ns = NULL;
> >> +
> >> +       client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 10000);
> >> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(client_fd, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
> >> +               goto out;
> >> +
> >> +       accept_fd = accept(server_fd, NULL, NULL);
> >> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(accept_fd, 0, "accept"))
> >> +               goto out;
> >> +
> >> +       ns = open_netns("synproxy");
> >> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ns, "setns"))
> >> +               goto out;
> >> +
> >> +       ctrl_file = SYS_OUT("./xdp_synproxy --iface tmp1 --single");
> >> +       size = fread(buf, 1, sizeof(buf), ctrl_file);
> >> +       pclose(ctrl_file);
> >> +       if (!ASSERT_TRUE(expect_str(buf, size, "Total SYNACKs generated: 1\n"),
> >> +                        "SYNACKs after connection"))
> >
> > please use ASSERT_STREQ instead, same above
>
> It doesn't fit here for two reasons:
>
> * It doesn't consider size (and ignoring size will cause a UB on errors
> because of the uninitialized buf).
>
> * buf is not '\0'-terminated, and ASSERT_STREQ uses strcmp.

can it be non-zero-terminated in normal case? see above about checking
for errors separately

>
> >
> >> +               goto out;
> >> +
> >> +out:
> >> +       if (accept_fd >= 0)
> >> +               close(accept_fd);
> >> +       if (client_fd >= 0)
> >> +               close(client_fd);
> >> +       if (server_fd >= 0)
> >> +               close(server_fd);
> >> +       if (ns)
> >> +               close_netns(ns);
> >> +
> >> +       system("ip link del tmp0");
> >> +       system("ip netns del synproxy");
> >> +}
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..9ae85b189072
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,750 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR Linux-OpenIB
> >
> > Can you please elaborate on what Linux-OpenIB license is and why
> > GPL-2.0 isn't enough? We usually have GPL-2.0 or LGPL-2.1 OR
> > BSD-2-Clause
>
> That's the license boilerplate we use in the mlx5e driver. I'll check
> with the relevant people whether we can submit it as GPL-2.0 solely.
>

ok

> >> +/* Copyright (c) 2021, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights reserved. */
> >> +
> >> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> >> +
> >> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> >> +#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
> >> +#include <asm/errno.h>
> >> +
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> +
> >> +static __always_inline __u16 csum_tcpudp_magic(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> >> +                                              __u32 len, __u8 proto,
> >> +                                              __u32 csum)
> >> +{
> >> +       __u64 s = csum;
> >> +
> >> +       s += (__u32)saddr;
> >> +       s += (__u32)daddr;
> >> +#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN__)
> >> +       s += proto + len;
> >> +#elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN__)
> >
> > I've got few nudges in libbpf code base previously to use
> >
> > #if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
> > #elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
> >
> > instead (I don't remember the exact reason now, but there was a
> > reason). Let's do the same here for consistency?
>
> OK.
>
> samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c also still uses __BIG_ENDIAN__.
>
> >> +       s += (proto + len) << 8;
> >> +#else
> >> +#error Unknown endian
> >> +#endif
> >> +       s = (s & 0xffffffff) + (s >> 32);
> >> +       s = (s & 0xffffffff) + (s >> 32);
> >> +
> >> +       return csum_fold((__u32)s);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static __always_inline __u16 csum_ipv6_magic(const struct in6_addr *saddr,
> >> +                                            const struct in6_addr *daddr,
> >> +                                            __u32 len, __u8 proto, __u32 csum)
> >> +{
> >> +       __u64 sum = csum;
> >> +       int i;
> >> +
> >> +#pragma unroll
> >> +       for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> >> +               sum += (__u32)saddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[i];
> >> +
> >> +#pragma unroll
> >
> > why unroll? BPF verifier handles such loops just fine, even if
> > compiler decides to not unroll them
>
> Optimization, see csum_ipv6_magic in net/ipv6/ip6_checksum.c that has
> this loop unrolled manually.
>
> >> +       for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> >> +               sum += (__u32)daddr->in6_u.u6_addr32[i];
> >> +
> >> +       // Don't combine additions to avoid 32-bit overflow.
> >> +       sum += bpf_htonl(len);
> >> +       sum += bpf_htonl(proto);
> >> +
> >> +       sum = (sum & 0xffffffff) + (sum >> 32);
> >> +       sum = (sum & 0xffffffff) + (sum >> 32);
> >> +
> >> +       return csum_fold((__u32)sum);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static __always_inline __u64 tcp_clock_ns(void)
> >
> > __always_inline isn't mandatory, you can just have static __u64
> > tcp_clock_ns() here and let compiler decide on inlining? same for
> > below
>
> Do you mean just these three functions, or all functions below, or
> actually all functions in this file?
>
> It's not mandatory, but these are simple one-liners, it would be
> unpleasant to waste an extra call in performance-critical code if the
> compiler decides not to inline them.
>

my point was that it's not mandatory anymore. Given this is a hybrid
high-performance sample and selftest, I don't care. If it was just a
test, there is no point in micro-optimizing this (similar for loop
unrolling).

> >> +{
> >> +       return bpf_ktime_get_ns();
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static __always_inline __u32 tcp_ns_to_ts(__u64 ns)
> >> +{
> >> +       return ns / (NSEC_PER_SEC / TCP_TS_HZ);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static __always_inline __u32 tcp_time_stamp_raw(void)
> >> +{
> >> +       return tcp_ns_to_ts(tcp_clock_ns());
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> > [...]
> >

[...]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists