netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: wwan: t7xx: Fix return type of t7xx_dl_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 17:35:43 -0700
From:   "Martinez, Ricardo" <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com, linuxwwan@...el.com,
        chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com, haijun.liu@...iatek.com,
        m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
        ryazanov.s.a@...il.com, johannes@...solutions.net,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: wwan: t7xx: Fix return type of
 t7xx_dl_add_timedout()


On 5/11/2022 12:19 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> t7xx_dl_add_timedout() now return int 'ret', but the return type
> is bool. Change the return type to int for furthor errcode upstream.
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c
> index c8bf6929af51..8ee15af1a1ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c
> @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ unsigned int t7xx_dpmaif_dl_dlq_pit_get_wr_idx(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info,
>   	return value & DPMAIF_DL_RD_WR_IDX_MSK;
>   }
>   
> -static bool t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info)
> +static int t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info)
yes, int is the right return type, thanks!
>   {
>   	u32 value;
>   	int ret;