[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220512090300.162e5441@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 09:03:00 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
Cc: "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5 3/3] ptp: clockmatrix: miscellaneous cosmetic
change
On Thu, 12 May 2022 03:12:13 +0000 Min Li wrote:
> > Not what I meant. I guess you don't speak English so no point trying to
> > explain. Please resend v4 and we'll merge that. v5 is not better.
>
> Where do you want me to do it then? PATCH 2?
First of all, I don't understand why you keep sending these patches for
net. Please add more information about the changes to the commit
messages.
For the formatting I was complaining about - you should fold updates to
the code you're _already_modifying_ into the relevant patches.
You can clean up the rest of the code but definitely not in net. Code
refactoring goes to net-next.
Perhaps a read of the netdev FAQ will elucidate what I'm on about:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists