[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKJ+9=ug79V_bd8LSsLaSu0VLtzZdDLC87rcvQ6UYieHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 14:31:48 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: Add READ_ONCE() to read tcp_orphan_count
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 2:18 PM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> I guess the question is, is it the norm that per_cpu() retrieves data
> that can legally be modified concurrently, or not. If not, and in most
> cases it's a bug, the annotations should be here.
>
> Paul, was there any guidance/documentation on this, but I fail to find
> it right now? (access-marking.txt doesn't say much about per-CPU
> data.)
Normally, whenever we add a READ_ONCE(), we are supposed to add a comment.
We could make an exception for per_cpu_once(), because the comment
would be centralized
at per_cpu_once() definition.
We will be stuck with READ_ONCE() in places we are using
per_cpu_ptr(), for example
in dev_fetch_sw_netstats()
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 1461c2d9dec8099a9a2d43a704b4c6cb0375f480..b66470291d7b7e6c33161093d71e40587f9ed838
100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -10381,10 +10381,13 @@ void dev_fetch_sw_netstats(struct
rtnl_link_stats64 *s,
stats = per_cpu_ptr(netstats, cpu);
do {
start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&stats->syncp);
- tmp.rx_packets = stats->rx_packets;
- tmp.rx_bytes = stats->rx_bytes;
- tmp.tx_packets = stats->tx_packets;
- tmp.tx_bytes = stats->tx_bytes;
+ /* These values can change under us.
+ * READ_ONCE() pair with too many write sides...
+ */
+ tmp.rx_packets = READ_ONCE(stats->rx_packets);
+ tmp.rx_bytes = READ_ONCE(stats->rx_bytes);
+ tmp.tx_packets = READ_ONCE(stats->tx_packets);
+ tmp.tx_bytes = READ_ONCE(stats->tx_bytes);
} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&stats->syncp, start));
s->rx_packets += tmp.rx_packets;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists