netdev - [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: inet: Remove count from inet_listen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220512000552.189036-1-kafai@fb.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 17:05:52 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: inet: Remove count from inet_listen_hashbucket

After commit 0ee58dad5b06 ("net: tcp6: prefer listeners bound to an address")
and commit d9fbc7f6431f ("net: tcp: prefer listeners bound to an address"),
the count is no longer used.  This patch removes it.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
 include/net/inet_hashtables.h | 1 -
 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c    | 6 ------
 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
index 98e1ec1a14f0..103fc7a30e60 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
@@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ struct inet_bind_hashbucket {
 #define LISTENING_NULLS_BASE (1U << 29)
 struct inet_listen_hashbucket {
 	spinlock_t		lock;
-	unsigned int		count;
 	union {
 		struct hlist_head	head;
 		struct hlist_nulls_head	nulls_head;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index a5d57fa679ca..968b15cc0a18 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ static void inet_hash2(struct inet_hashinfo *h, struct sock *sk)
 	else
 		hlist_add_head_rcu(&inet_csk(sk)->icsk_listen_portaddr_node,
 				   &ilb2->head);
-	ilb2->count++;
 	spin_unlock(&ilb2->lock);
 }
 
@@ -225,7 +224,6 @@ static void inet_unhash2(struct inet_hashinfo *h, struct sock *sk)
 
 	spin_lock(&ilb2->lock);
 	hlist_del_init_rcu(&inet_csk(sk)->icsk_listen_portaddr_node);
-	ilb2->count--;
 	spin_unlock(&ilb2->lock);
 }
 
@@ -657,7 +655,6 @@ int __inet_hash(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk)
 	else
 		__sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(sk, &ilb->nulls_head);
 	inet_hash2(hashinfo, sk);
-	ilb->count++;
 	sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE);
 	sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, 1);
 unlock:
@@ -689,7 +686,6 @@ static void __inet_unhash(struct sock *sk, struct inet_listen_hashbucket *ilb)
 		struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo = sk->sk_prot->h.hashinfo;
 
 		inet_unhash2(hashinfo, sk);
-		ilb->count--;
 	}
 	__sk_nulls_del_node_init_rcu(sk);
 	sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
@@ -882,7 +878,6 @@ void inet_hashinfo_init(struct inet_hashinfo *h)
 		spin_lock_init(&h->listening_hash[i].lock);
 		INIT_HLIST_NULLS_HEAD(&h->listening_hash[i].nulls_head,
 				      i + LISTENING_NULLS_BASE);
-		h->listening_hash[i].count = 0;
 	}
 
 	h->lhash2 = NULL;
@@ -896,7 +891,6 @@ static void init_hashinfo_lhash2(struct inet_hashinfo *h)
 	for (i = 0; i <= h->lhash2_mask; i++) {
 		spin_lock_init(&h->lhash2[i].lock);
 		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&h->lhash2[i].head);
-		h->lhash2[i].count = 0;
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2