lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 11:51:22 +0800 From: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> To: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com> Cc: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net/smc: non blocking recvmsg() return -EAGAIN when no data and signal_pending On 2022/5/12 11:43, Tony Lu wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:11:55AM +0800, Guangguan Wang wrote: >> Non blocking sendmsg will return -EAGAIN when any signal pending >> and no send space left, while non blocking recvmsg return -EINTR >> when signal pending and no data received. This may makes confused. >> As TCP returns -EAGAIN in the conditions described above. Align the >> behavior of smc with TCP. >> >> Fixes: 846e344eb722 ("net/smc: add receive timeout check") >> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> >> Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com> > > I see that you have already sent this patch to net, so this patch is a > duplicate. There is no need to send it again to net-next. > > Thanks, > Tony Lu Ok, just ignore it. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists