[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220512074546.231616-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 13:15:44 +0530
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] bpf ppc64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg
This adds two atomic opcodes BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG on ppc64, both
of which include the BPF_FETCH flag. The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg
operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register
fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API
calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be BPF_REG_R0. Also, kernel's
atomic_cmpxchg returns the previous value at dst_reg + off. JIT the
same for BPF too with return value put in BPF_REG_0.
BPF_REG_R0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off, BPF_REG_R0, src_reg);
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 504fa459f9f3..df9e20b22ccb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -783,6 +783,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
*/
case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW:
+ u32 save_reg = tmp2_reg;
+ u32 ret_reg = src_reg;
+
/* Get offset into TMP_REG_1 */
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, off));
tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4;
@@ -813,6 +816,24 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH:
EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
break;
+ case BPF_CMPXCHG:
+ /*
+ * Return old value in BPF_REG_0 for BPF_CMPXCHG &
+ * in src_reg for other cases.
+ */
+ ret_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0);
+
+ /* Compare with old value in BPF_R0 */
+ if (size == BPF_DW)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPD(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg));
+ else
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg));
+ /* Don't set if different from old value */
+ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4);
+ fallthrough;
+ case BPF_XCHG:
+ save_reg = src_reg;
+ break;
default:
pr_err_ratelimited(
"eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
@@ -822,15 +843,14 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
/* store new value */
if (size == BPF_DW)
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
else
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
/* we're done if this succeeded */
PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx);
- /* For the BPF_FETCH variant, get old value into src_reg */
if (imm & BPF_FETCH)
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(src_reg, _R0));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ret_reg, _R0));
break;
/*
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists