lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 16:44:32 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> CC: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>, ipsec-devel <devel@...ux-ipsec.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 3/6] xfrm: add an interface to offload policy On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:36:54PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com> > > +int xfrm_dev_policy_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_policy *xp, > + struct xfrm_user_offload *xuo, u8 dir) > +{ > + struct xfrm_dev_offload *xdo = &xp->xdo; > + struct net_device *dev; > + int err; > + > + if (!xuo->flags || xuo->flags & ~XFRM_OFFLOAD_FULL) > + /* We support only Full offload mode and it means > + * that user must set XFRM_OFFLOAD_FULL bit. > + */ > + return -EINVAL; Minor nit: Please add the comment before the 'if' statement or use braces.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists