netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f602858b-98c8-9b82-7b00-f2716ff15071@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Fri, 13 May 2022 16:46:25 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing
 issue

On 5/13/22 3:01 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> The ima_setup.sh is needed by test_progs test_ima. But the file is
> missed if we build test_progs separately or installed bpf test to
> another folder. This patch set fixed the issue in 2 different
> scenarios.
> 
> v2: no code update, just repost to bpf-next

Is this against an old tree? This doesn't apply to bpf-next, fwiw, please
rebase your series.

> Hangbin Liu (2):
>    selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh
>    selftests/bpf: add missed ima_setup.sh in Makefile
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 11 ++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks,
Daniel