lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 22:49:45 -0700 From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com> To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>, Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 13/13] mlx5: support BIG TCP packets On 12 May 21:34, Eric Dumazet wrote: >On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 9:29 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com> wrote: >> >> On 12 May 11:02, Paolo Abeni wrote: >> >On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 01:40 -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote: >> >> On 09 May 20:32, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> >> > From: Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com> >> >> > >> >> > mlx5 supports LSOv2. >> >> > >> >> > IPv6 gro/tcp stacks insert a temporary Hop-by-Hop header >> >> > with JUMBO TLV for big packets. >> >> > >> >> > We need to ignore/skip this HBH header when populating TX descriptor. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Sorry i didn't go through all the documentations or previous discussions, >> >> please bare with me, so why not clear HBH just before calling the >> >> driver xmit ndo ? >> > >> >I guess this way is more efficient: the driver copies IP hdr and TCP >> >hdr directly in the correct/final location into the tx descriptor, >> >otherwise the caller would have to memmove L2/L3 just before the driver >> >copies them again. >> >> >> >> memmove(sizeof(L2/L3)) is not that bad when done only every 64KB+. >> it's going to be hard to repeat this and maintain this across all drivers >> only to get this micro optimization that I doubt it will be even measurable. > >We prefer not changing skb->head, this would break tcpdump. > in that case we can provide a helper to the drivers to call, just before they start processing the skb. >Surely calling skb_cow_head() would incur a cost. > Sure, but the benefit of this patch outweighs this cost by orders of magnitude, you pay an extra 0.1$ for a cleaner code, and you still get your 64K$ BIG TCP cash. >As I suggested, we can respin the series without the mlx5 patch, this >is totally fine for us, if we can avoid missing 5.19 train. To be clear, I am not nacking, Tariq already reviewed and gave his blessing, and i won't resist this patch on v6. I am Just suggesting an improvement to code readability and scalability to other drivers. FWIW: Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists