netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] net: ipqess: introduce the Qualcomm IPQESS driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yn/kWG7X1YCPk17F@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Sat, 14 May 2022 18:18:17 +0100
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
        Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] net: ipqess: introduce the Qualcomm
 IPQESS driver

On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 05:06:52PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> +static int ipqess_do_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
> +{
> +	struct ipqess *ess = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> +	switch (cmd) {
> +	case SIOCGMIIPHY:
> +	case SIOCGMIIREG:
> +	case SIOCSMIIREG:
> +		return phylink_mii_ioctl(ess->phylink, ifr, cmd);
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}

Is there a reason this isn't just:

	return phylink_mii_ioctl(ess->phylink, ifr, cmd);

?

> +static int ipqess_axi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	struct net_device *netdev;
> +	phy_interface_t phy_mode;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	struct ipqess *ess;
> +	int i, err = 0;
> +
> +	netdev = devm_alloc_etherdev_mqs(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct ipqess),
> +					 IPQESS_NETDEV_QUEUES,
> +					 IPQESS_NETDEV_QUEUES);
> +	if (!netdev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ess = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +	ess->netdev = netdev;
> +	ess->pdev = pdev;
> +	spin_lock_init(&ess->stats_lock);
> +	SET_NETDEV_DEV(netdev, &pdev->dev);
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, netdev);
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	ess->hw_addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(ess->hw_addr))
> +		return PTR_ERR(ess->hw_addr);
> +
> +	err = of_get_phy_mode(np, &phy_mode);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "incorrect phy-mode\n");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	ess->ess_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ess");
> +	if (!IS_ERR(ess->ess_clk))
> +		clk_prepare_enable(ess->ess_clk);
> +
> +	ess->ess_rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, "ess");
> +	if (IS_ERR(ess->ess_rst))
> +		goto err_clk;
> +
> +	ipqess_reset(ess);
> +
> +	ess->phylink_config.dev = &netdev->dev;
> +	ess->phylink_config.type = PHYLINK_NETDEV;
> +
> +	__set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL,
> +		  ess->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);

No mac capabilities?

> +
> +	ess->phylink = phylink_create(&ess->phylink_config,
> +				      of_fwnode_handle(np), phy_mode,
> +				      &ipqess_phylink_mac_ops);

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!