[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220514220010.GB3629122@euler>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 15:00:10 -0700
From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v8 net-next 00/16] add support for VSC7512 control over SPI
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 05:13:05PM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:52:57AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> >
> > mdio0: mdio0@0 {
>
> This is going to be interesting. Some drivers with multiple MDIO buses
> create an "mdios" container with #address-cells = <1> and put the MDIO
> bus nodes under that. Others create an "mdio" node and an "mdio0" node
> (and no address for either of them).
>
> The problem with the latter approach is that
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mdio.yaml does not accept the
> "mdio0"/"mdio1" node name for an MDIO bus.
I'm starting this implementation. Yep - it is interesting.
A quick grep for "mdios" only shows one hit:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-bluebox3.dts
While that has an mdios field (two, actually), each only has one mdio
bus, and they all seem to get parsed / registered through
sja1105_mdiobus_.*_register.
Is this change correct (I have a feeling it isn't):
ocelot-chip@0 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
...
mdio0: mdio@0 {
reg=<0>;
...
};
mdio1: mdio@1 {
reg = <1>;
...
};
...
};
When I run this with MFD's (use,)of_reg, things work as I'd expect. But
I don't directly have the option to use an "mdios" container here
because MFD runs "for_each_child_of_node" doesn't dig into
mdios->mdio0...
>
> > compatible = "mscc,ocelot-miim";
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > sw_phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
> > reg = <0x0>;
> > };
> >
> > sw_phy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
> > reg = <0x1>;
> > };
> >
> > sw_phy2: ethernet-phy@2 {
> > reg = <0x2>;
> > };
> >
> > sw_phy3: ethernet-phy@3 {
> > reg = <0x3>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > mdio1: mdio1@1 {
> > compatible = "mscc,ocelot-miim";
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > pinctrl-0 = <&miim1>;
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > sw_phy4: ethernet-phy@4 {
> > reg = <0x4>;
> > };
> >
> > sw_phy5: ethernet-phy@5 {
> > reg = <0x5>;
> > };
> >
> > sw_phy6: ethernet-phy@6 {
> > reg = <0x6>;
> > };
> >
> > sw_phy7: ethernet-phy@7 {
> > reg = <0x7>;
> > };
> > };
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists