[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0660a42-eb82-1834-6b24-04c122af2311@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 08:47:42 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] UDP/IPv6 refactoring
On 5/16/22 7:48 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 16:26 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Refactor UDP/IPv6 and especially udpv6_sendmsg() paths. The end result looks
>> cleaner than it was before and the series also removes a bunch of instructions
>> and other overhead from the hot path positively affecting performance.
>>
>> Testing over dummy netdev with 16 byte packets yields 2240481 tx/s,
>> comparing to 2203417 tx/s previously, which is around +1.6%
>
> I personally feel that some patches in this series have a relevant
> chance of introducing functional regressions and e.g. syzbot will not
> help to catch them. That risk is IMHO relevant considered that the
> performance gain here looks quite limited.
>
> There are a few individual changes that IMHO looks like nice cleanup
> e.g. patch 5, 6, 8, 9 and possibly even patch 1.
>
> I suggest to reduce the patchset scope to them.
>
I agree with that sentiment. The set also needs testcases that captures
the various permutations.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists