netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/5] New BPF helpers to accelerate synproxy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 20:17:48 +0300
From:   Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/5] New BPF helpers to accelerate synproxy

On 2022-05-11 14:48, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> On 2022-05-11 02:59, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:21 PM Maxim Mikityanskiy 
>> <maximmi@...dia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2022-05-07 00:51, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is it expected that your selftests will fail on s390x? Please check [0]
>>>
>>> I see it fails with:
>>>
>>> test_synproxy:FAIL:ethtool -K tmp0 tx off unexpected error: 32512 
>>> (errno 2)
>>>
>>> errno 2 is ENOENT, probably the ethtool binary is missing from the s390x
>>> image? When reviewing v6, you said you added ethtool to the CI image.
>>> Maybe it was added to x86_64 only? Could you add it to s390x?
>>>
>>
>> Could be that it was outdated in s390x, but with [0] just merged in it
>> should have pretty recent one.
> 
> Do you mean the image was outdated and didn't contain ethtool? Or 
> ethtool was in the image, but was outdated? If the latter, I would 
> expect it to work, this specific ethtool command has worked for ages.

Hi Andrii,

Could you reply this question? I need to understand whether I need to 
make any changes to the CI before resubmitting.

Thanks,
Max