netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: call skb_defer_free_flush() before each napi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 11:56:34 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: call skb_defer_free_flush() before
 each napi_poll()

On Mon, 16 May 2022 11:26:14 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 11:21 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 15 May 2022 21:24:56 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:  
> > > -end:
> > > -     skb_defer_free_flush(sd);
> > > +end:;  
> >
> > Sorry for the nit pick but can I remove this and just return like we
> > did before f3412b3879b4? Is there a reason such "label:;}" is good?  
> 
> I thought that having a return in the middle of this function would
> hurt us at some point.

I guess personal preference. Let's leave it unless someone else shares
my disregard for pointlessly jumping to the closing bracket :)