netdev - Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 3/6] xfrm: add an interface to offload policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 08:18:15 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>,
        ipsec-devel <devel@...ux-ipsec.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 3/6] xfrm: add an interface to offload policy

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:44:32PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:36:54PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> >  
> > +int xfrm_dev_policy_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_policy *xp,
> > +			struct xfrm_user_offload *xuo, u8 dir)
> > +{
> > +	struct xfrm_dev_offload *xdo = &xp->xdo;
> > +	struct net_device *dev;
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	if (!xuo->flags || xuo->flags & ~XFRM_OFFLOAD_FULL)
> > +		/* We support only Full offload mode and it means
> > +		 * that user must set XFRM_OFFLOAD_FULL bit.
> > +		 */
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Minor nit: Please add the comment before the 'if' statement or
> use braces.

Sure, will do.