lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 10:24:53 +0800
From:   Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, jolsa@...nel.org, davemarchevsky@...com,
        joannekoong@...com, geliang.tang@...e.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
        songmuchun@...edance.com, wangdongdong.6@...edance.com,
        cong.wang@...edance.com, zhouchengming@...edance.com,
        zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase

From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>

comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220511093854.411-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/T/

use /* */ instead of //
use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
use 8 bytes for value size
fix memory leak
use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU

Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c   | 49 +++++++++------
 .../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c   | 61 ++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
@@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
 
 #include <test_progs.h>
 
 #include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
 
-#define TEST_VALUE  1
-
 void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
 {
 	struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
-	int key = 0, ret;
-	int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
-	int *buf;
+	__u64 key = 0, sum;
+	int ret, i;
+	int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+	__u64 *buf;
 
-	buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
+	buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
 		return;
-	memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
-	buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
 
-	skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
-		return;
+	for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
+		buf[i] = i;
+	sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
+
+	skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
+		goto exit;
+
+	skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
+
+	ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
 	ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
-	ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
+		goto cleanup;
 
 	ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, buf, 0);
 	ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
@@ -37,10 +46,14 @@ void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
 
 	syscall(__NR_getuid);
 
-	ret = skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
-	      skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
-	      skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE;
-	ASSERT_OK(!ret, "bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem success");
+	test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__detach(skel);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_array lookup percpu elem");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_hash lookup percpu elem");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_lru_hash lookup percpu elem");
 
+cleanup:
 	test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__destroy(skel);
+exit:
+	free(buf);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
index 5d4ef86cbf48..75479180571f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
@@ -1,52 +1,69 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
 
 #include "vmlinux.h"
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 
-int percpu_array_elem_val = 0;
-int percpu_hash_elem_val = 0;
-int percpu_lru_hash_elem_val = 0;
+__u64 percpu_array_elem_sum = 0;
+__u64 percpu_hash_elem_sum = 0;
+__u64 percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum = 0;
+const volatile int nr_cpus;
 
 struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
 	__uint(max_entries, 1);
 	__type(key, __u32);
-	__type(value, __u32);
+	__type(value, __u64);
 } percpu_array_map SEC(".maps");
 
 struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH);
 	__uint(max_entries, 1);
-	__type(key, __u32);
-	__type(value, __u32);
+	__type(key, __u64);
+	__type(value, __u64);
 } percpu_hash_map SEC(".maps");
 
 struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH);
 	__uint(max_entries, 1);
-	__type(key, __u32);
-	__type(value, __u32);
+	__type(key, __u64);
+	__type(value, __u64);
 } percpu_lru_hash_map SEC(".maps");
 
+struct read_percpu_elem_ctx {
+	void *map;
+	__u64 sum;
+};
+
+static int read_percpu_elem_callback(__u32 index, struct read_percpu_elem_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	__u64 key = 0;
+	__u64 *value;
+	value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(ctx->map, &key, index);
+	if (value)
+		ctx->sum += *value;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 SEC("tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getuid")
 int sysenter_getuid(const void *ctx)
 {
-	__u32 key = 0;
-	__u32 cpu = 0;
-	__u32 *value;
+	struct read_percpu_elem_ctx map_ctx;
 
-	value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(&percpu_array_map, &key, cpu);
-	if (value)
-		percpu_array_elem_val = *value;
+	map_ctx.map = &percpu_array_map;
+	map_ctx.sum = 0;
+	bpf_loop(nr_cpus, read_percpu_elem_callback, &map_ctx, 0);
+	percpu_array_elem_sum = map_ctx.sum;
 
-	value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(&percpu_hash_map, &key, cpu);
-	if (value)
-		percpu_hash_elem_val = *value;
+	map_ctx.map = &percpu_hash_map;
+	map_ctx.sum = 0;
+	bpf_loop(nr_cpus, read_percpu_elem_callback, &map_ctx, 0);
+	percpu_hash_elem_sum = map_ctx.sum;
 
-	value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(&percpu_lru_hash_map, &key, cpu);
-	if (value)
-		percpu_lru_hash_elem_val = *value;
+	map_ctx.map = &percpu_lru_hash_map;
+	map_ctx.sum = 0;
+	bpf_loop(nr_cpus, read_percpu_elem_callback, &map_ctx, 0);
+	percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum = map_ctx.sum;
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists