[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b9d18e351cc58aed65c4a4c7f12f167984ee088.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 09:51:31 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
alex.aring@...il.com, stefan@...enfreihafen.org,
mareklindner@...mailbox.ch, sw@...onwunderlich.de, a@...table.cc,
sven@...fation.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ifdefy the wireless pointers in struct
net_device
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 14:56 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WIRELESS)
> struct wireless_dev *ieee80211_ptr;
> +#endif
Technically, you should be able to use CONFIG_CFG80211 here, but in
practice I'd really hope nobody enables WIRELESS without CFG80211 :)
> +++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
> @@ -8004,10 +8004,7 @@ int cfg80211_register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev);
> *
> * Requires the RTNL and wiphy mutex to be held.
> */
> -static inline void cfg80211_unregister_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
> -{
> - cfg80211_unregister_wdev(dev->ieee80211_ptr);
> -}
> +void cfg80211_unregister_netdevice(struct net_device *dev);
Exported functions aren't free either - I think in this case I'd
(slightly) prefer the extra ifdef.
Anyway, we can do this, but I also like Florian's suggestion about the
union, and sent an attempt at a disambiguation patch there.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists