[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHNKnsSyH4YWBpd7bioY5BzbdG7U7F7m31RxtbxULpp52hkVuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 11:35:23 +0300
From: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
To: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
Cc: "Devegowda, Chandrashekar" <chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com>,
Intel Corporation <linuxwwan@...el.com>,
chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com,
Haijun Liu (刘海军)
<haijun.liu@...iatek.com>,
M Chetan Kumar <m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com>,
Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: wwan: t7xx: fix GFP_KERNEL usage in
spin_lock context
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 9:30 AM Ziyang Xuan
<william.xuanziyang@...wei.com> wrote:
> t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq() call t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb() in spin_lock
> context, But __dev_alloc_skb() in t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb() uses
> GFP_KERNEL, that will introduce scheduling factor in spin_lock context.
>
> Because t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq() is called after stopping CLDMA, so we can
> remove the spin_lock from t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq().
>
> Fixes: 39d439047f1d ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add control DMA interface")
> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists