[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220517153942.6ze5kj7hoj7z4caq@bsd-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 08:39:42 -0700
From: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 08/10] ptp: ocp: fix PPS source selector
reporting
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 06:54:28PM -0700, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 05:43:17PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 May 2022 15:59:22 -0700 Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > > The NTL timecard design has a PPS1 selector which selects the
> > > the PPS source automatically, according to Section 1.9 of the
> > > documentation.
> > >
> > > If there is a SMA PPS input detected:
> > > - send signal to MAC and PPS slave selector.
> > >
> > > If there is a MAC PPS input detected:
> > > - send GNSS1 to the MAC
> > > - send MAC to the PPS slave
> > >
> > > If there is a GNSS1 input detected:
> > > - send GNSS1 to the MAC
> > > - send GNSS1 to the PPS slave.MAC
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
> >
> > This one and patch 10 need Fixes tags
>
> This is for a debugfs entry. I disagree that a Fixes: tag
> is needed here.
>
> I'll do it for patch 10 if you insist, but this only happens
> if ptp_clock_register() fails, which not normally seen.
Actually, patch 10 would be:
Fixes: c205d53c4923 ("ptp: ocp: Add firmware capability bits for feature gating")
Which is only in 5.18-rcX at this point.
Do we need a fixes tags for code which hasn't made it into a
full release release yet?
--
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists