[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220517103202.6613c5ef@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 10:32:02 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, johannes@...solutions.net, alex.aring@...il.com,
stefan@...enfreihafen.org, mareklindner@...mailbox.ch,
sw@...onwunderlich.de, a@...table.cc, sven@...fation.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ifdefy the wireless pointers in struct
net_device
On Tue, 17 May 2022 07:36:54 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
> > +void cfg80211_unregister_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + cfg80211_unregister_wdev(dev->ieee80211_ptr);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_unregister_netdevice);
>
> Why moving this to a proper function? Just curious, I couldn't figure it
> out.
Sorry, I went too far with the "explain what not why".
The header is included in places which get built without
WIRELESS while the C source is not.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists