netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: dsa: add out-of-band tagging protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220517135836.4455e77b@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 13:58:36 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
        Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: dsa: add out-of-band tagging
 protocol

On Tue, 17 May 2022 08:53:55 +0200 Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > This must had been asked on v1 but there's no trace of it in the
> > current submission afaict...  
> 
> No you're correct, this wasn't explained.
> 
> > If the tag is passed in the descriptor how is this not a pure
> > switchdev driver? The explanation must be preserved somehow.  
> 
> The main reason is that although the MAC and switch are rightly coupled
> on that platform, the switch is actually a QC8K that can live on it's
> own, as an external switch. Here, it's just a slightly modified version
> of this IP.
> 
> The same goes for the MAC IP, but so far we don't support any other
> platform that have the MAC as a standalone controller. As far as we can
> tell, platforms that have this MAC also include a QCA8K, but the
> datasheet also mentions other modes (like outputing RGMII).

Got it, thanks! Please weave this justification more explicitly into 
the cover letter.

> Is this valid to have it as a standalone ethernet driver in that
> situation ?

Quite possibly.. I won't pretend I've looked at the code, I defer 
to the reviewers :)