netdev - Re: [RFC Patch net-next v2 8/9] net: dsa: microchip: add the phylink get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ef01dec-687f-6e16-1921-a1a4d5b08732@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 19:58:06 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@...rochip.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next v2 8/9] net: dsa: microchip: add the phylink
 get_caps



On 5/13/2022 3:22 AM, Arun Ramadoss wrote:
> This patch add the support for phylink_get_caps for ksz8795 and ksz9477
> series switch. It updates the struct ksz_switch_chip with the details of
> the internal phys and xmii interface. Then during the get_caps based on
> the bits set in the structure, corresponding phy mode is set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@...rochip.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>

Many ways to skin a cat^w report what a given port can do to phylink, I 
would have probably used a bitmask for each type of interface, but this 
works as well.
-- 
Florian