netdev - Re: [PATCH -next] net: wwan: t7xx: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock in t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZdPi9uvh4E70-AXpGrdzkgh35mfWQbhL8Kxw_o9_DsfL2gbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 11:13:56 +0200
From:   Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
To:     Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        haijun.liu@...iatek.com, chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com,
        ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] net: wwan: t7xx: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock in t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr()

Hi Yang,

On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 10:57, Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Sometimes t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr() is called under spin lock,
> so add a parameter in t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr() to make if it
> use GFP_ATOMIC flag.
>
> Fixes: 39d439047f1d ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add control DMA interface")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c
> index 0c52801ed0de..1fa9bb763831 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c
> @@ -91,9 +91,12 @@ static void t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr(struct cldma_gpd *gpd, dma_addr_t next_p
>  }
>
>  static int t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, struct cldma_request *req,
> -                                       size_t size)
> +                                       size_t size, bool is_atomic)

Would be simpler to directly pass the gfp_mask as a parameter.


>  {
> -       req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (is_atomic)
> +               req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +       else
> +               req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!req->skb)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -174,7 +177,7 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_gpd_rx_from_q(struct cldma_queue *queue, int budget, bool
>                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->ring_lock, flags);
>                 req = queue->rx_refill;
>
> -               ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, queue->tr_ring->pkt_size);
> +               ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, queue->tr_ring->pkt_size, false);
>                 if (ret)
>                         return ret;
>
> @@ -402,7 +405,7 @@ static struct cldma_request *t7xx_alloc_rx_request(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, s
>         if (!req->gpd)
>                 goto err_free_req;
>
> -       val = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, pkt_size);
> +       val = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, pkt_size, false);
>         if (val)
>                 goto err_free_pool;
>
> @@ -801,7 +804,7 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, int qnum)
>                 if (req->skb)
>                         continue;
>
> -               ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, rxq->tr_ring->pkt_size);
> +               ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, rxq->tr_ring->pkt_size, true);
>                 if (ret)
>                         break;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>