netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] can: skb:: move can_dropped_invalid_skb and can_skb_headroom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 01:01:36 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     Max Staudt <max@...as.org>
Cc:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] can: skb:: move can_dropped_invalid_skb and
 can_skb_headroom_valid to skb.c

On Thu. 19 May 2022 at 00:52, Max Staudt <max@...as.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2022 00:38:51 +0900
> Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>
> > On Wed. 18 May 2022 at 23:59, Oliver Hartkopp
> > <socketcan@...tkopp.net> wrote:
> > > I can send a patch for this removal too. That's an easy step which
> > > might get into 5.19 then.
> >
> > OK, go ahead. On my side, I will start to work on the other changes
> > either next week or next next week, depending on my mood.
>
> Any wishes for the next version of can327/elmcan?

The only thing I guess would be to remove the check against
CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY in your xmit() function. The other things, I
already commented :)

> Should I wait until your changes are in?

I do not think you have to wait. There are no real dependencies. You
might just want to add a note after the --- scissors in the patch that
there is a weak dependencies on
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20220514141650.1109542-5-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr/


Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol