[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220518185307.GL3302100-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 13:53:07 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Milan Stevanovic <milan.stevanovic@...com>,
Jimmy Lalande <jimmy.lalande@...com>,
Pascal Eberhard <pascal.eberhard@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/12] dt-bindings: net: dsa: add bindings
for Renesas RZ/N1 Advanced 5 port switch
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 02:41:11PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> Le Wed, 18 May 2022 15:05:03 +0300,
> Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> a écrit :
>
> > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 08:59:24PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 06:33:37PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:22:21AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > > +patternProperties:
> > > > > > + "^ethernet-ports$":
> > > > >
> > > > > Move to 'properties', not a pattern.
> > > > >
> > > > > With that,
> > > > >
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > Even if it should have been "^(ethernet-)?ports$"?
> > >
> > > Why? Allowing 'ports' is for existing users. New ones don't need the
> > > variability and should use just 'ethernet-ports'.
> > >
> > > Rob
> >
> > Yeah, ok, somehow the memo that new DSA drivers shouldn't support "ports"
> > didn't reach me. They invariably will though, since the DSA framework is
> > the main parser of the property, and that is shared by both old and new
> > drivers.
>
> Should also the subnodes of "ethernet-ports" use the
> "ethernet-port@[0-9]*" naming ? Or keeping the existing pattern is ok
> (ie "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-4]$") ?
I prefer the former, but care less. The whole reason for 'ethernet-'
prefix is to make this distinct from the graph binding that uses ports
and port.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists