[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6dfe9bc-07ac-62a7-0a34-12fecf0dfdaa@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 11:35:43 +0800
From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<hpa@...or.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@....com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Delyan Kratunov <delyank@...com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/6] bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to
the public trampoline code
On 5/17/2022 11:53 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 03:18:35AM -0400, Xu Kuohai wrote:
>>
>> +static bool is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> + if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS) &&
>> + (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + /* BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops,
>> + * and it must be used alone.
>> + */
>> + if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET) &&
>> + (flags & ~BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int bpf_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr, void *image,
>> + void *image_end, const struct btf_func_model *m,
>> + u32 flags, struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks,
>> + void *orig_call)
>> +{
>> + if (!is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(flags))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(tr, image, image_end, m, flags,
>> + tlinks, orig_call);
>> +}
>
> It's an overkill to introduce a new helper function just to validate
> flags that almost compile time constants.
> The flags are not user supplied.
> Please move /* BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops ... */
> comment to bpf_struct_ops.c right before it calls arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline()
> And add a comment to trampoline.c saying that BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS
> and BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME should not be set together.
> We could add a warn_on there or in arch code, but feels like overkill.
> .
OK, will fix in next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists