[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AS1PR06MB8442A643D0EBE2DFD7190D208BD19@AS1PR06MB8442.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 06:36:32 +0000
From: "Bartschies, Thomas" <Thomas.Bartschies@....de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: AW: [Patch] net: af_key: check encryption module availability
consistency
Hi,
thanks for the info. I've reposted it with the appropriate mail headers you've suggested. Although I saw my first post in
the LKML and netdev archives. It's my first own patch posting.
Best regards,
--
Thomas Bartschies
CVK IT Systeme
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2022 02:45
An: Bartschies, Thomas <Thomas.Bartschies@....de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [Patch] net: af_key: check encryption module availability consistency
On Mon, 16 May 2022 14:57:30 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Bartschies wrote:
> Since the recent introduction supporting the SM3 and SM4 hash algos for IPsec, the kernel
> produces invalid pfkey acquire messages, when these encryption modules are disabled. This
> happens because the availability of the algos wasn't checked in all necessary functions.
> This patch adds these checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bartschies <thomas.bartschies@....de>
This has not made it into patchwork.
Did you put the list on BCC or something? If so how would people
on the list see replies to this patch?
Please repost it with appropriate To: and CC: lists.
To: davem@...emloft.net
CC: everyone from scripts/get_maintainer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists