[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zgjd1sd4.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 17:58:47 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amitkarwar@...il.com,
ganapathi017@...il.com, sharvari.harisangam@....com,
huxinming820@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: wireless: marvell: mwifiex: fix sleep in atomic context bugs
Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn> writes:
> There are sleep in atomic context bugs when uploading device dump
> data on usb interface. The root cause is that the operations that
> may sleep are called in fw_dump_timer_fn which is a timer handler.
> The call tree shows the execution paths that could lead to bugs:
>
> (Interrupt context)
> fw_dump_timer_fn
> mwifiex_upload_device_dump
> dev_coredumpv(..., GFP_KERNEL)
> dev_coredumpm()
> kzalloc(sizeof(*devcd), gfp); //may sleep
> dev_set_name
> kobject_set_name_vargs
> kvasprintf_const(GFP_KERNEL, ...); //may sleep
> kstrdup(s, GFP_KERNEL); //may sleep
>
> This patch moves the operations that may sleep into a work item.
> The work item will run in another kernel thread which is in
> process context to execute the bottom half of the interrupt.
> So it could prevent atomic context from sleeping.
>
> Fixes: f5ecd02a8b20 ("mwifiex: device dump support for usb interface")
> Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>
mwifiex patches go to wireless-next, not net tree.
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix compile problem.
So you don't even compile test your patches? That's bad and in that case
I'll just directly drop this. We expect that the patches are properly
tested.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists