lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220519003410.2531936-1-ycheng@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 17:34:10 -0700
From:   Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, ncardwell@...gle.com,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tcp: improve PRR loss recovery

This patch improves TCP PRR loss recovery behavior for a corner
case. Previously during PRR conservation-bound mode, it strictly
sends the amount equals to the amount newly acked or s/acked.

The patch changes s.t. PRR may send additional amount that was banked
previously (e.g. application-limited) in the conservation-bound
mode, similar to the slow-start mode. This unifies and simplifies the
algorithm further and may improve the recovery latency. This change
still follow the general packet conservation design principle and
always keep inflight/cwnd below the slow start threshold set
by the congestion control module.

PRR is described in RFC 6937. We'll include this change in the
latest revision rfc6937-bis as well.

Reported-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 97cfcd85f84e..3231af73e430 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -2620,12 +2620,12 @@ void tcp_cwnd_reduction(struct sock *sk, int newly_acked_sacked, int newly_lost,
 		u64 dividend = (u64)tp->snd_ssthresh * tp->prr_delivered +
 			       tp->prior_cwnd - 1;
 		sndcnt = div_u64(dividend, tp->prior_cwnd) - tp->prr_out;
-	} else if (flag & FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED && !newly_lost) {
-		sndcnt = min_t(int, delta,
-			       max_t(int, tp->prr_delivered - tp->prr_out,
-				     newly_acked_sacked) + 1);
 	} else {
-		sndcnt = min(delta, newly_acked_sacked);
+		sndcnt = max_t(int, tp->prr_delivered - tp->prr_out,
+			       newly_acked_sacked);
+		if (flag & FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED && !newly_lost)
+			sndcnt++;
+		sndcnt = min(delta, sndcnt);
 	}
 	/* Force a fast retransmit upon entering fast recovery */
 	sndcnt = max(sndcnt, (tp->prr_out ? 0 : 1));
-- 
2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ