[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec16c0b5-b8c7-3bd1-e733-f054ec3c2cd1@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 09:08:52 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: <duoming@....edu.cn>
CC: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<amitkarwar@...il.com>, <ganapathi017@...il.com>,
<sharvari.harisangam@....com>, <huxinming820@...il.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: wireless: marvell: mwifiex: fix sleep in
atomic context bugs
On 5/19/2022 5:08 PM, duoming@....edu.cn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 19 May 2022 08:48:44 -0700 Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>>>>> There are sleep in atomic context bugs when uploading device dump
>>>>> data on usb interface. The root cause is that the operations that
>>>>> may sleep are called in fw_dump_timer_fn which is a timer handler.
>>>>> The call tree shows the execution paths that could lead to bugs:
>>>>>
>>>>> (Interrupt context)
>>>>> fw_dump_timer_fn
>>>>> mwifiex_upload_device_dump
>>>>> dev_coredumpv(..., GFP_KERNEL)
>>
>> just looking at this description, why isn't the simple fix just to
>> change this call to use GFP_ATOMIC?
>
> Because change the parameter of dev_coredumpv() to GFP_ATOMIC could only solve
> partial problem. The following GFP_KERNEL parameters are in /lib/kobject.c
> which is not influenced by dev_coredumpv().
>
> kobject_set_name_vargs
> kvasprintf_const(GFP_KERNEL, ...); //may sleep
> kstrdup(s, GFP_KERNEL); //may sleep
Then it seems there is a problem with dev_coredumpm().
dev_coredumpm() takes a gfp param which means it expects to be called in
any context, but it then calls dev_set_name() which, as you point out,
cannot be called from an atomic context.
So if we cannot change the fact that dev_set_name() cannot be called
from an atomic context, then it would seem to follow that
dev_coredumpv()/dev_coredumpm() also cannot be called from an atomic
context and hence their gfp param is pointless and should presumably be
removed.
/jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists