[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220520153413.16c6830b@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 15:34:13 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net, vladimir.oltean@....com,
po.liu@....com, boon.leong.ong@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/11] ethtool: Add support for frame
preemption
On Thu, 19 May 2022 18:15:27 -0700 Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> Changes from v4:
> - Went back to exposing the per-queue frame preemption bits via
> ethtool-netlink only, via taprio/mqprio was seen as too much
> trouble. (Vladimir Oltean)
> - Fixed documentation and code/patch organization changes (Vladimir
> Oltean).
First of all - could you please, please, please rev these patches more
than once a year? It's really hard to keep track of the context when
previous version was sent in Jun 2021 :/
I disagree that queue mask belongs in ethtool. It's an attribute of
a queue and should be attached to a queue. The DCBNL parallel is flawed
IMO because pause generation is Rx, not Tx. There is no Rx queue in
Linux, much less per-prio.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists