[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYCU-jz9aks3q4Y+nvjkTyoqnW4CAL6KujioLOoAiJ3YA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 16:16:57 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] bpf_trace: pass array of u64 values in kprobe_multi.addrs
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:34 AM Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 04:48:59PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Not sure how you can do that without having extra test_progs variant
> > that's running in compat mode?
>
> I think, all bpf selftests are to be run in compat mode as well,
> now is a good time to enable this as any.
>
It's going to add a noticeable delay to CI runs, which is bad. Until
we have everything set up to run test_progs flavors in parallel,
adding compat flavor is not an option.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists