netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] wwan: iosm: use a flexible array rather than allocate short objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 23:03:53 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        m.chetan.kumar@...el.com, linuxwwan@...el.com,
        loic.poulain@...aro.org, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
        johannes@...solutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wwan: iosm: use a flexible array rather than
 allocate short objects

On Thu, 19 May 2022 23:00:13 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> GCC array-bounds warns that ipc_coredump_get_list() under-allocates
> the size of struct iosm_cd_table *cd_table.
> 
> This is avoidable - we just need a flexible array. Nothing calls
> sizeof() on struct iosm_cd_list or anything that contains it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

Coincidentally IDK if this:

int ipc_coredump_get_list(struct iosm_devlink *devlink, u16 cmd)

	if (byte_read != MAX_CD_LIST_SIZE)
		goto cd_init_fail;

shouldn't set ret before jumping? Maybe set it to 0 if it's okay for 
it to be zero to make that clear?