[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220519230353.420c7a46@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 23:03:53 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
m.chetan.kumar@...el.com, linuxwwan@...el.com,
loic.poulain@...aro.org, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
johannes@...solutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wwan: iosm: use a flexible array rather than
allocate short objects
On Thu, 19 May 2022 23:00:13 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> GCC array-bounds warns that ipc_coredump_get_list() under-allocates
> the size of struct iosm_cd_table *cd_table.
>
> This is avoidable - we just need a flexible array. Nothing calls
> sizeof() on struct iosm_cd_list or anything that contains it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Coincidentally IDK if this:
int ipc_coredump_get_list(struct iosm_devlink *devlink, u16 cmd)
if (byte_read != MAX_CD_LIST_SIZE)
goto cd_init_fail;
shouldn't set ret before jumping? Maybe set it to 0 if it's okay for
it to be zero to make that clear?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists