[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220523032437.1059718-1-liuyacan@corp.netease.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 11:24:37 +0800
From: liuyacan@...p.netease.com
To: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ubraun@...ux.ibm.com,
liuyacan <liuyacan@...p.netease.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net/smc: postpone sk_refcnt increment in connect()
From: liuyacan <liuyacan@...p.netease.com>
Same trigger condition as commit 86434744. When setsockopt runs
in parallel to a connect(), and switch the socket into fallback
mode. Then the sk_refcnt is incremented in smc_connect(), but
its state stay in SMC_INIT (NOT SMC_ACTIVE). This cause the
corresponding sk_refcnt decrement in __smc_release() will not be
performed.
Signed-off-by: liuyacan <liuyacan@...p.netease.com>
Fixes: 86434744 ("net/smc: add fallback check to connect()")
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index fce16b9d6..45a24d242 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1564,9 +1564,9 @@ static int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
if (rc && rc != -EINPROGRESS)
goto out;
- sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
if (smc->use_fallback)
goto out;
+ sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
if (flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
if (queue_work(smc_hs_wq, &smc->connect_work))
smc->connect_nonblock = 1;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists