netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] libbpf: add lsm_cgoup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 16:26:14 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc:     Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] libbpf: add lsm_cgoup_sock type

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 3:55 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> lsm_cgroup/ is the prefix for BPF_LSM_CGROUP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index ef7f302e542f..854449dcd072 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -9027,6 +9027,7 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
>         SEC_DEF("fmod_ret.s+",          TRACING, BPF_MODIFY_RETURN, SEC_ATTACH_BTF | SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_trace),
>         SEC_DEF("fexit.s+",             TRACING, BPF_TRACE_FEXIT, SEC_ATTACH_BTF | SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_trace),
>         SEC_DEF("freplace+",            EXT, 0, SEC_ATTACH_BTF, attach_trace),
> +       SEC_DEF("lsm_cgroup+",          LSM, BPF_LSM_CGROUP, SEC_ATTACH_BTF),

we don't do simplistic prefix match anymore, so this doesn't have to
go before lsm+ (we do prefix match only for legacy SEC_SLOPPY cases).
So total nit (but wanted to dispel preconception that we need to avoid
subprefix matches), I'd put this after lsm+


>         SEC_DEF("lsm+",                 LSM, BPF_LSM_MAC, SEC_ATTACH_BTF, attach_lsm),
>         SEC_DEF("lsm.s+",               LSM, BPF_LSM_MAC, SEC_ATTACH_BTF | SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_lsm),
>         SEC_DEF("iter+",                TRACING, BPF_TRACE_ITER, SEC_ATTACH_BTF, attach_iter),
> @@ -9450,6 +9451,7 @@ void btf_get_kernel_prefix_kind(enum bpf_attach_type attach_type,
>                 *kind = BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF;
>                 break;
>         case BPF_LSM_MAC:
> +       case BPF_LSM_CGROUP:
>                 *prefix = BTF_LSM_PREFIX;
>                 *kind = BTF_KIND_FUNC;
>                 break;
> --
> 2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog
>